Leadership and  School Improvement Framework

School Leadership Framework Matrix

School Leadership Framework

Development Stages Matrix

Framework Area Beginning Stage Emerging Stage Dynamic Stage
CORE AREAS
Leadership
  • No shared vision or values exist
  • Safeguarding concerns present
  • Poor progress and outcomes
  • Over-reliance on external support
  • Inconsistent performance management
  • Poor stakeholder communication
  • Shared vision and values demonstrated
  • Effective safeguarding arrangements
  • Accurate improvement identification
  • Clear accountability structures
  • Consistent performance management
  • Effective community engagement
  • Values embedded in all decisions
  • High-quality professional development
  • Strategic stakeholder engagement
  • Innovation and risk-taking encouraged
  • System leadership contribution
  • Distributed leadership excellence
Governance
  • No unifying strategy or values
  • Poor resource management
  • Variable performance management
  • Poor policy compliance
  • No stakeholder consultation
  • Skills gaps at multiple levels
  • Coherent strategy in place
  • Adequate resource management
  • Systematic policy compliance
  • Clear scheme of delegation
  • Regular stakeholder communication
  • Governance handbook established
  • Deep stakeholder consultation
  • Exceptional resource management
  • Comprehensive impact evaluation
  • Multi-stakeholder feedback systems
  • Competency-based recruitment
  • System leadership contribution
Culture
  • No unifying values present
  • Frequent bullying allegations
  • Poor attendance (staff/pupils)
  • High exclusion levels
  • Elevated staff turnover
  • Climate of fear and lack of innovation
  • Shared values and expectations
  • Improving educational outcomes
  • National benchmark attendance
  • Low exclusion levels
  • Systematic CPD programme
  • Earned autonomy and innovation
  • Values demonstrated by everyone
  • Elevated attendance levels
  • Extremely low exclusions
  • Systematic use of stakeholder voice
  • Innovation actively encouraged
  • Celebration systems embedded
THE SIX LEVERS
Accountability
  • No clear accountability structures
  • Poor data collection and analysis
  • No stakeholder reporting
  • Inconsistent intervention approaches
  • External accountability seen as burden
  • Poor financial accountability
  • Clear accountability structures
  • Regular performance monitoring
  • Systematic intervention strategies
  • Regular stakeholder reporting
  • Some evaluation of initiatives
  • Adequate financial oversight
  • Accountability embedded in culture
  • Strategic use of performance data
  • Proactive issue identification
  • Comprehensive stakeholder engagement
  • Rigorous initiative evaluation
  • Exemplary financial management
Knowledge
  • No systematic data approach
  • Data stored in silos
  • Decisions not evidence-informed
  • Limited data literacy
  • Poor information governance
  • No systematic learning from evidence
  • Basic data collection systems
  • Some evidence-informed decisions
  • Growing data literacy
  • Improving information governance
  • Some evaluation taking place
  • Technology systems integrating
  • Sophisticated data systems
  • All decisions evidence-informed
  • High levels of data literacy
  • Advanced analytics capabilities
  • Exemplary information governance
  • Strategic knowledge management
Curriculum
  • No coherent curriculum vision
  • Inconsistent planning approaches
  • Limited progression consideration
  • Curriculum doesn't meet all needs
  • Assessment not aligned with intent
  • Variable delivery quality
  • Developing curriculum vision
  • Some consistency in planning
  • Some attention to progression
  • Beginning to address different needs
  • Some curriculum-assessment alignment
  • Some enrichment opportunities
  • Clear, ambitious curriculum vision
  • Highly consistent planning
  • Expertly designed for all pupils
  • Assessment fully aligned
  • Rich, varied enrichment
  • Outstanding subject leadership
Collaboration
  • Little or no collaboration exists
  • Staff work independently
  • No formal partnerships
  • Limited parent/community engagement
  • Competitive rather than collaborative culture
  • No resource or expertise sharing
  • Some collaborative activities emerging
  • Some practice sharing occurring
  • Some partnerships developing
  • Some professional learning communities
  • Some cross-curricular work
  • Culture becoming more collaborative
  • Collaboration systematic and embedded
  • Regular structured practice sharing
  • Strategic value-adding partnerships
  • Thriving professional communities
  • Rich cross-curricular collaboration
  • Strategic external collaboration
Technology
  • Limited or outdated infrastructure
  • Ad-hoc technology use
  • Staff lack confidence/skills
  • Limited pupil access
  • No strategic planning
  • Inadequate technical support
  • Basic infrastructure in place
  • Some technology integration
  • Most staff have basic skills
  • Some strategic planning
  • Some use for administration
  • Basic digital citizenship coverage
  • Robust, reliable infrastructure
  • Seamless technology integration
  • All staff confident users
  • Equitable access for all pupils
  • Strategic planning aligned with vision
  • Comprehensive digital citizenship
Pedagogy
  • Inconsistent teaching methods
  • Limited understanding of learning
  • Assessment doesn't support learning
  • Limited differentiation
  • Ineffective feedback to pupils
  • Subject knowledge gaps
  • Some consistency in approaches
  • Growing understanding of learning
  • Assessment beginning to support learning
  • Some differentiation taking place
  • Some use of research evidence
  • Growing repertoire of strategies
  • Highly consistent, evidence-informed practice
  • Deep understanding of learning science
  • Assessment seamlessly supports learning
  • Sophisticated differentiation
  • Outstanding subject knowledge
  • Extensive strategy repertoire